Also not my point about ourselves, rather more that my wife and I work in the field of childhood and have academic knowledge of education and the teacher I mentioned is a language teacher here and whose ideas are in this thread, plus her own children who are bi- and tri-lingual are themselves also following the French curriculum. It is a circular argument as well. The many French children at present in the UK are not excluded from French in schools where it is taught for pragmatic reasons.
I would agree that the French education system is not very good compared to good but paid for schools in England. However, private education in France like England is very different and I would not say that one is better than the other. However, supposedly 'best' schools in both private and public sectors in most countries are measured by exam results and curiously at present, looking at UNESCO's figures for instance, France is improving whereas England (bearing in mind Scotland and Wales are now separate and have different curricula to England) is going down quite quickly.
It is quite subjective generally, my children went to an award winning school before we moved here. Where we are now does not 'shine' academically in my opinion. Moreover, one of our children has special needs and left primary school after an extra year there at least a year behind where she was when we moved to France. So your criticism has full respect as we see it. However, unless we intend to move to another country or back to the UK, long term goals must incorporate the curriculum on offer, thus the qualifications gained here.
My daughters are Swiss citizens as well as 'British' and were they to be educated in that country would be obliged to study all three (of four) national languages plus English. There would be no opt out because their first language is English and nobody opts out because they are French, German, Italian or Rumantsch first language speakers.
There is also a well proven problem in that the way grammar and syntax are taught vary between countries, indeed vocabulary and word usage varies too, thus the English learned here can be hellishly poor when looked at from our perspective. More so when there are teachers who do not actually speak or even understand the language they are teaching. However, a complete education, flaws and all has its merits. The main one being that one fills the criteria for the qualifications for which our young are examined.
I agree and in the final year of primary my younger daughter will agree that watching paint dry is far more exciting than her English lessons. She will also concede that she is learning grammar in the formal setting of school which includes using the books used for study purposes.
Perhaps in some people's terms we are too inclusive of our children in discussing everything with them, however our areas of so-called expertise include 'child participation' and 'children's citizenship' from which we too have learned. Therefore, we discuss and listen and particularly acknowledge points about how children do not want to be different which being let off English already marks them as, without looking at it in terms of them being foreign and the curriculum as well.
So, no matter how 'privileged' our own education was, which is why I drew that into it, we have to see things through different eyes and weigh them up against a different set of values. The outcome is as pragmatic as we can be, thus both daughters do English and will continue to do so irrespective of how good or bad, banal or boring we believe it to be.