Interesting articles

I was going to post this under photography, but its remit is actually potentially wider and perhaps it can become a thread of interesting links that might otherwise be missed, or overlooked by many SFers

One of my favorite places in Paris. And one of the last places I took my mother to (not counting UK) and somewhere have a photo of her in same place as Rabindranath Tagore with the blossom. You can buy prints of some of their photos, which are on nice paper.

Havenā€™t been since re-opened after their restoration.

(And I am now going to have to spend the rest of the night looking for that photo!)

2 Likes

Hereā€™s another debate - Is grafitti art?

I feel it can be but not every fool with a spray can is an artist. Some who are

Thanks, for making me think a bit!

First thoughtsā€¦

The articles starts off by by being over-ambitious and the definitions could probably be better considered - for instance I feel uncomfortable about formally commissioned public sculpture falling within the subject.

Iā€™d prefer a definition of street art that retains its characteristic edginess - something along the lines of ā€˜unauthorised visual interventions in public spaceā€™, rather than trying to do it by categories of medium/technique.

Some time back we went to a new nearby museum of street art, MAUSA. It was a guided tour just for us and two friends and was fascinating. The guide, hugely knowledgeable, really made us understand the ā€œartā€in street art and look at graffiti in a new way.

Sadly the whole thing then foundered in debt and disputes.

https://street-heart.com/PM-D39230-01%20Mausa%20Sellieres.htm

1 Like

Iā€™m very ambivalent about it in formal situations, because once itā€™s ā€˜authorisedā€™ it becomes incorporated in a much broader canon of art and most of it doesnā€™t hold oneā€™s interest. Nearby Decazeville has a street art festival every year and the work is invariably technically accomplished but iconographically derivative and superficial.

By contrast since the mid-Seventies, Iā€™ve had a soft spot for those little, informal French spray paint and stencil urban interventions.

1 Like

MAUSA was great, a huge sprawling complex of semi-derelict buildings with people doing their own thing all over the place.

Glad you enjoyed it and Iā€™m sure a lot of others did too, but in a French fine art context. Iā€™ve got a lot of reservations. But did do a Google image search to check out MAUSA.

Forty years ago, I was interested in, and made work influenced by Figuration Libre of the time and invented BD type narratives, but I subsequently moved on. By contrast a lot of French figurative painters havenā€™t developed further and are still stuck in the Eighties, just as the previous generation are still stuck in Fifties pastiches of Art Brut and Ab Ex.

As you might have guessed, Iā€™m not a big fan of most current French painting.

Reminds me a bit of Belfast in the 80ā€™s

1 Like

I agree. I expect the article was written more for an introductory audience and seeks to pigeon hole artworks for easier consumption.

I enjoy witty street art that says something. I would much prefer to see, even less accomplished images rather than all those silly taggers who leave only their stylised names over surfaces.

ā€œSay something, people!ā€ (And maybe a bit more than ā€˜Macron la puteā€™.)

The buildings were a metalworks factory making fireplates and stoves, and this work reflects that. So not that far off!